That's great - but it'd also be great if you WEREN'T partnering with oil companies to more efficiently pull oil out of the ground. That oil needs to stay where it is, and only economics will keep it there. It's not enough to be good; stop helping bad guys do bad things.
-
-
-
We need fossil fuels to transition in to a carbon neutral state. Having an "Us vs. Them" mentality towards energy doesn't do anything to fix the problem, it simply creates a rift. Oil and gas is required for many more things than just energy generation.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Apparently $300 billion is enough to reverse climate change. Surely a company with a $1 trillion market cap can afford a lot more than $1 billion. We expect more from Microsoft this is a decent start
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
First dotnet core and now this, excellent work!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Really pleased that carbon negative has entered the thinking, rather than neutral
-
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Better idea. We tax Microsoft as they should be and use that money as a society to fight climate change
-
Why not both?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you for setting the example of the impact companies can make with
#boldgoals dedicated to investing in#sustainability.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.