You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Is it really the role of the private sector to determine which threats should have the privilege of being kept secret, and particularly what are the true (current and future) intentions of the threat actor?
And yes I pose the previous questions fully aware that the intent of most publications isn’t some altruistic effort for collective safety, but it’s just marketing and PR value.
These are tough questions. I think governmental CERTs should be accountable for "public safety", not the private companies that mostly do this for PR.
Don’t you think that governmental CERTs would rather reinforce more secrecy in order to maintain an intelligence advantage over (and at the cost of) other nations?
Depends on "who" is running the CERT. For instance, in France the national CERT is not run by an intelligence agency and doesn't have any ties to it. But I get that may be an issue in other countries (like the UK, NCSC part of the GCHQ, which raises a few questions)
Would be interesting to see governmental CERTs burn foreign operations irrespective of alliances and economic interests. Would that really work?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
