The overwhelming majority of arrests involve crimes with no identifiable “sheep” or with physically absent “sheep” (car break ins, etc)
You can define it however you want. I think it makes the most sense to understand "victims" as people who have suffered a harm. A harm might be tangible (stolen property or physical harm) or it might be 'psychic' to borrow a term from standing doctrine (would include fear, etc)
-
-
If I'm driving and my risk temporarily increases b/c there's a drunk driver on the road, but I don't know that or see the person or experience fear, I haven't suffered a harm in either of those two senses. Sure, a wrong was done, mb even to me, but the wrong carried no harm to me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.