I must be stuck in the past because my criterion to evaluate the relative importance of a language feature is still roughly “did Java 1.1 have this”. If not, you can *probably* be a productive developer without it
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Doesn’t mean languages shouldn’t add new features of course, just that nothing is truly “essential” and maybe language implementors should spend a little bit more time on tooling instead
7 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @slava_pestov
Mmm i used to rag on Java for years (while not using it) for having excessively verbose syntax, lack of features etc. Then a professional Java programmer showed me all the plugins/tools/assists that IntelliJ and the related tooling provided to patch over this. Mind blown
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
Java had shit lambdas? Didn’t matter? IntelliJ made them look good. Lack of type inference? Lombok patches it in. The language was almost irrelevant compared to the tooling (which I guess to be fair is what you have to do when your language is rubbish
)
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.