Additionally, the city had almost 800 fatal overdoses in 2020. Where is the evidence of this massacre in Nielson's selective reporting?
The information is gray and nuanced, and releasing it will cause people to take it completely out of context. There's no point in releasing that information so people can pin it on the wrong parties.
-
-
There's nothing nuanced about answering the same public records requests to favorable columnists, and rejecting them to those who are not. In fact its illegal.https://loub.substack.com/p/boudin-broke-sf-sunshine-laws?justPublished=true …
-
No there's not. That's what you get when politics is intertwined with the criminal legal system. I believe all DA's and Sheriffs should be appointed, not elected, to remove these politics out of the system
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"The public interest is not served by releasing trial and prosecution decisions to the public for scrutiny." Seriously, man, ... that sounds a little more Stalin, Mao, Che and Pol Pot than Marx. Socialism, SF flava!
-
If at some point someone can produce thousands of pages that describe the nuances of each case that brought it to its resolution, I'm all for it. Producing aggregate numbers for dismissals, dispositions, and trials with no context helps no one.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.