California has avoided more heatwave-driven rolling blackouts so far this week via energy conservation, demand response, backup power and batteries. Could this be a lesson in meeting long-term grid reliability challenges as clean energy grows in scale?https://bit.ly/3haRWJi
In NY, given the CLCPA, we compute GHG emissions based on GWP-20 (20 year Global Warming Potential) and we include all up-stream production, transmission, storage and distribution emissions in addition to burner-tip emissions. Also, 1/
-
-
NY goal is 40% emissions reduction by 2030, 85% by 2050 and 0% from electricity by 2040. Thus, emissions reductions drive policy, not social cost of carbon. Given clean electricity in 2040, we can also assume significant latent-decarbonization from Beneficial Electrification. 2/
-
You have to start by doing that calculation using marginal hourly GHGs of a kW. We can't just assume that by 2040 all hours are GHG free because of a goal... We have to sort how to get enough clean electrons to cover 6am in the winter... not easy!http://t.ly/6Fhx
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are those emissions hourly, locational, and marginal? If so, where can I find them? Here are the CA system numbers and forecast, though it varies by location substantially as well.pic.twitter.com/gs6B33Ctrz
-
Here are marginal emission factors for all zones in New York State averaged across 2015-2016 by month, day-of-week, and hour-of-day. Note: 6am is pretty clean. Our problem is afternoon and evening. Solar will address afternoon, wind will address night and winter.pic.twitter.com/QVFjARaEoH
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.