12/ Utilities also argue that such rates create beneficial cost shifts because permanent increases in sales volume create more sales base over which to spread fixed costs. Of course, these increases also drive demand for new power plants and infrastructure.
-
Show this thread
-
13/ Point 3. Whether a potential cost shift is good or bad also depends on the quality of the underlying rate. Class rates are based on average usage. Customers who use less pay less than average and are often accused by utilities of not paying a “fair share” of costs. But . . .
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
14/ under cost of service regulation, you are only supposed to pay for what you use. They are just heeding the price signal. Crying “cost shift!” whenever a customer uses less makes no sense. Crying “cost shift” only in response to certain ways in which customers use less ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
15/ like through installing distributed generation (DG), is discriminatory absent actual evidence of avoided payment for caused costs. Note that there is a lot of evidence that DG customers actually cost much less to serve than non-DG customers. That means ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
16/ most DG customers have costs shifted onto them unless they are put on a rate that credits them for those reduced costs. Finally, since utilities operate under cost-of-service regimes, it is fair to suggest that the vast majority of potential ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
17/ cost shifts arise from bad planning, forecasting, and grid investment. If the utility had accounted for DG growth and built accordingly, the rate would recover the revenue required. Didn’t they see it coming? Should customers pay for every utility mistake? That is:
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
18/ Rates send price signals to utilities, too. When a regulator guarantees recovery of every cost, they tell the utility that cost control doesn’t matter—the opposite of substituting for the forces of competition the utility would otherwise face. That leads to my final point.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
19/ Point 4 is that dealing with cost shifts is complicated, a bit subjective, and a matter of policy preferences. Rates and the forecasts they are built on are seldom if ever perfect. A utility rate case can involve hundreds of different and potentially offsetting potential ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
20/ cost shifts. Dealing with one at a time is usually a bad idea—“piece meal rate making.” Dealing with tiny ones when giant ones are staring you in the face is administratively inefficient and discriminatory. Some deserve action; some deserve watchful waiting. Some are ...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
21/ actually intended. The very best place to start is with objective benefit-cost analysis for the programs involved. Understanding cost-effectiveness can inform the very separate, subjective task of allowing or adjusting potential cost shifts in rate proceedings. <30>
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
Intra-Rate Class cost shifts are inevitable whenever class members have non-identical usage patterns. The "Residential" Rate Class is bogus. Homes with heat pumps and those with fossil fuel heating have dramatically different usage profiles.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.