Because it's the most efficient, low-cost, and *low-carbon* way of heating Minnesota homes and businesses. And not by a little bit.https://twitter.com/brucenilles/status/1087939524762701840 …
-
Show this thread
-
Richard Meyer Retweeted Bruce Nilles
Yes. Have to look at the whole system. 1. Heat pumps will not be operating at 300-400% efficiency during the depths of a Minnesota winter. And 2. It takes more than 3x the BTUs to get the electricity to the customer before its consumed.https://twitter.com/brucenilles/status/1088132164389089283?s=19 …
Richard Meyer added,
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @RichardMeyerDC
Geothermal heat pump efficiency is not tied to outside air temperature. In any case, electric grid is not 100% fossil fueled. Thus, fossil fuel consumption is reduced when using heat pumps. As grid decarbonizes, so do all the attached heat pumps, electric vehicles, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bobwyman @RichardMeyerDC
Bob, regardless of the efficiency of geothermal pump systems, what is economic benefit of installing these systems vs Nat Gas How many homes across US already have these systems in place? Are you proposing transition through gov subsidies?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
NYSERDA estimates that a geothermal heat pump, replacing oil in ConEd's territory, pays $827/yr in excess delivery charges. Excess payments subsidize gas users' energy costs. For NatGrid, the cost-shift subsidy is $396/yr. For PSEG Long Island, it is $637/yr. HPs subsidize Gas...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.