For those who seek regulation based on zero #CO2 only, CO2 causes only ~46% of global warming and hardly impacts the 4-7 million people who die from air pollution each year. We need #100% renewable energy to help eliminate air pollution mortality and slow/reverse global warming
-
-
Replying to @mzjacobson
The Social Cost of Pollution (SCOP) is often 10x the Social Cost of Carbon (SCOC). SCOP impacts are immediate and local while SCOC is global and long term. Environmentalists leave much "money on the table" when they focus only on long-term GHG but ignore death and disease today.
1 reply 12 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @bobwyman @mzjacobson
Hi Bob and Marc. I’m doing some CO2 reduction calcs and want to add SCOC/P co-benefits. Do you know any current resources that can provide a reasonable and simple SCOC/P per tCO2e ratio? It’s not the focus of the study, so I need to keep it simple (for workload reasons).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnhanseneco @mzjacobson
See https://cedm.shinyapps.io/MarginalFactors/ … for estimates of marginal and average SCOC/P for various emissions from just electricity. No one seems to have good numbers for SCOP for heating fuel, but it is much higher than for electricity due to low chimneys and proximity to exposed population.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Note: Regions in the CMU data are described in the EPA eGrid data: https://www.epa.gov/energy/emissions-generation-resource-integrated-database-egrid … eGrid is a reasonable source for data on electricity-related emissions. (Of course, that is only a small part of emissions in many areas such as New York and Northeast.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bobwyman @mzjacobson
Hi
@bobwyman. Thanks for the resources, much appreciated. I hate to admit it, but my climate-geek looks forward to digging into them. Cheers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
For more fun, see NYU's "More Residual Risk" study that we used to justify banning use of bunker fuel (#6 oil) for heating in New York City. Health impacts (SCOP), not SCOC, provided the compelling argument. Of course, reducing pollution also reduced GHG. http://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/More_Residual_Risks.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.