Very cool. NY and NE should do this. "California will shift from annual to hourly GHG emissions tracking to focus reductions"https://www.utilitydive.com/news/california-shift-from-annual-to-hourly-ghg-emissions-tracking-to-focus-redu/524837/ …
-
CMU marginal factors are developed using hourly emissions and generation data. Recent values use same method from original paper (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es300145v …). eGRID uses annual data, assumes a mix of all plants that have excess capacity.
Thanks for the clarification. But, now we have at least three sets of numbers that don't agree: 1) eGrid, 2) CMU, and 3) NYISO (for 2015/2016)... Grumble... If you don't mind another question: Why are AP2 damage estimates so much higher than EASIUR estimates?
-
-
NYISO/CMU are trying to do the same thing (emissions from plants on the margin). They have the advantage of non-public data but it also means impossible to check/replicate. eGRID is looking at a higher level trend of what existing plants could *generally* meet additional demand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
EASIUR is a reduced form model at least partially created from AP2. Intelligent answers beyond that are beyond my expertise. Might contact
@inesliaz or Peter Adams at CMU.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.