Why isn't the President's power implicitly limited by his oath to "faithfully execute the Office ..., and ... preserve, protect and defend the Constitution?" If so, an intent to obstruct would be forbidden even if the specific actions taken were otherwise permitted. @tribelaw
2:17 PM - 2 Jun 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.