The Human Landing System program needs competition, not the delay of starting over. The National Team has an open architecture, deep experience, massive self-funded investments and a safe, low-risk design to return to the Moon. Let’s go. #Artemis
Conversation
Here’s a snapshot of the progress that the National Team has already made to land Americans on the Moon. bit.ly/33VOJsp
144
47
480
lol, you realize nobody supports you anymore. Do great work and fail gracefully if you aren't chosen. BO's whining over losing is old-school defense contractor style. You aren't "new space", you are "Old space 2.0".
1
4
259
Jeff has the potential to go big in space, but he needs to get his goals straight. The Moon is a feel-good goal, but the important goal is Mars. If you design your system architecture around the Moon, you will inevitably loose in the long run.
1
21
Show replies
You literally caused NASA to stop development of lunar starship because of your protest. What are you talking about 😂
3
7
693
starship is still developing, right now the orbit platform is being built at starbase for a launch in a few months
2
8
Show replies
Of course low risk is great and we’d all love 2 landers but the price was not competitive whatsoever and you failed to meet the requirements. The risk now is a big delay to Artemis programme as a whole due to a pause in development of the HLS programme.
15
42
1,537
To everyone in the replies saying “You lost”
Yeah because congress only gave NASA enough funds for one lander.
If NASA had the money they needed, the national team would’ve been chosen as well 🤦♂️
90
11
268