Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Why is the World Economic Forum taking climate advice from a 16 year old climate campaigner instead of the world’s only Nobel climate economist?pic.twitter.com/44FQmDb1dd
"Let's stop emissions" is simple but also absolutely impossible CO₂ emissions are byproducts of billions of people using reliable and cheap energy for heat, cold, food, electricity – all the things that make the world a better place
Nordhaus shows that a moderate, increasing, globally coordinated carbon tax can reduce temperatures – optimally by 0.6°C in 2100 down to 3.5°C Policy costs of $20 trillion will still be outweighed by lower climate costs https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170046 …
But remember, this is already incredibly challenging (it requires *all* nations to tax all carbon, all at the same pace across the century If not, the policy costs will escalate, making climate policy less effective and possibly net damaging
And Thunberg's solution to "just say no" is not only naive and impossible. Trying to attain it, will incur tens or even hundreds of trillions of dollars of net costs. World Economic Forum is committed to improving the state of the world – and this ain't it
Based on what?
Lol, the right wing doesn't care who it is. They aren't listening to either.
The person and the simple message is the difference...
I guess the same reason they thought flying 1,500 jets to Davos would help the environment
interesting comment, is this a fact?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
