Something I saw on a cooking show that perfectly applies to academic papers: the simpler the idea, the better the execution has to be. If the idea is simple, even small flaws in writing or evaluation will seem big to reviewers.
-
-
Agree it depends on the paper, but papers like what you point are extremely rare (the case I'm talking about is considerably more pedestrian). The job of an eval isn't to provide "something new" but rather to prove the main claims of the paper.
-
if they are rare then maybe we should accept more such papers.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.