Treading Carefully 0.1: Continuing from yesterday's thread on the definitions of the Acc strands, it was - roughly - agreed that the contention between the 2 currently deadlocked camps (U/Acc & R/Acc) is in actuality a question of free will -
-
-
L/R don't acknowledge the ways theyre already immanent to the processes they say theyre rebelling against. Each feeds the other, continuing the same old processes. U/Acc rejects praxes of both cos all they do is consolidate state and subject. U/Acc seeks to fragment both.pic.twitter.com/ulyl9GpYPB
-
It rejects praxis of both yet isn't this outer-system force its own praxis? What is it that is causing the fragmenting exactly?
-
The fragmenting is already inherent. L/R, long before /acc, have always sought to course correct. The fragmenting of acc itself into its various offshoots is the ultimate irony. L/R try to course correct. U/Acc is Acc as it always was, unadulterated.
-
Wait, does uacc have an end goal?
-
"Let the future take care of itself"would be its end goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.