This is nonsense.
e.g. very human can't help but care about their own animal pleasure. But anyone but a degenerate hedonist will admit that pleasure isn't the point of life. It may be necessary to fight against our own cares if we want to be anything more noble than a gluttonous sex pervert.
-
-
>It may be necessary to fight against our own cares Fighting against our "cares" is a form of Care you silly.
-
So what? I'm not denying its existence as an abstraction.
-
So then you accept it as a first axiom that enframes things we can talk about.
-
"Abstraction" and "first axiom" are incompatible
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.