The ego is just a placeholder we use to describe the primary "machinic" processes that produce consciousness in the brain. What the "ego" constituted by these processes wants or “ cares" about is no more inherently significant than e.g. the arrangement of carbon atoms in a rock.
-
-
Replying to @biodysphoria
I made a huge mistake in the above tweet by using the word "ego" because I have very little Care about the specific Landian definition of that word -- I simply meant "the thing that Cares"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locus_of_Ctrl
It's the same thing. It's not about the word you use. There's no separable entity that cares. Care is produced by the machinic unconscious. It's not the property of an absolute individual actor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @biodysphoria @Locus_of_Ctrl
There's no unitary being; only anonymous becoming
12:31 PM - 28 Jun 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.