I’m really not worried about that. The Powers That Be are not going to last long enough to implement dystopian Soy-genics.
-
-
https://track5.mixtape.moe/vybdrw.pdf Heidegger piece is in Fanged Noumena here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See, those are exactly the pieces I don’t take seriously because they read like maniacal ravings of a furry on LSD.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity … supplementary reading
-
You're not even wrong in a sense, and Land isn't an easy author. But he is as serious of a philosopher as any living English-speaker.
-
Pure illustration here... I've read enough Freud to know that Thanatos was his mistake (it doesn't exist). So I'm reading Land and he mentions Thanatos passingly... I am grasping my hair... Why... it's a vague reference to an inaccurate concept... Dammit.
-
Machinic desire doesn't erase traditions... it creates new ones, equally stupid ones... because it's not machinic desire at the end... there is a human at the end... not a very attractive specimen, but a human one
-
If substitution of protein crystals (or RNA crystals?) with DNA was deterritorialization, it means nothing to us... It's absurd to imagine a crystalline form "caring" about its DNA-based descendants... they are not like it by definition....
-
Machinistic desire is a meaningless term... it's absurd to even contemplate much less to greet or expect its arrival... The looking glass I talked about will either contain it or transform it into something completely unrecognizable.
-
Capital ends where desire ends, so there is no capitalism behind the looking glass... there is something else... we cannot know what that something else is... therefore it's absurd for us to talk about it... "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence" etc
- 24 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.