The response to Corbyn seems to driven by a fear that he will actually tackle inequality. But Gov should work for the many, not the few ->https://twitter.com/swardley/status/856418976846491648 …
-
-
En réponse à @swardley
You talk about tackling inequality as if that's a good thing. It can't happen without huge limits on freedom. Equal misery results.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
Inequality is the wrong way for us to look at it. How about that it's horribly inefficient for capital to be hoarded by 0.01%
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
So what? It's not your money, hence not your business.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
Ownership not relevant. Hoarding in tax havens, empty real-estate, slows the flow of capital through the economy, reducing innovation&growth
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Again. So what? If you believe in property, that's not your problem. If you don't, you're a commie, and talking with you is pointless.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
I apologise, I assumed an engineer would be receptive to an argument about the efficiency of systems
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
What you want is to hack the conception of property. Be careful. Huge unintended consequences await.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
A fair point. And I don't want to do the moral argument, more interested in efficiency. But think how much land given by medieval king..
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
There are good arguments for monarchy over democracy. I want no archy. Also, taxation is extortion.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.