The response to Corbyn seems to driven by a fear that he will actually tackle inequality. But Gov should work for the many, not the few ->https://twitter.com/swardley/status/856418976846491648 …
-
-
En réponse à @swardley
You talk about tackling inequality as if that's a good thing. It can't happen without huge limits on freedom. Equal misery results.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
Inequality is the wrong way for us to look at it. How about that it's horribly inefficient for capital to be hoarded by 0.01%
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
So what? It's not your money, hence not your business.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
Ownership not relevant. Hoarding in tax havens, empty real-estate, slows the flow of capital through the economy, reducing innovation&growth
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Again. So what? If you believe in property, that's not your problem. If you don't, you're a commie, and talking with you is pointless.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
I apologise, I assumed an engineer would be receptive to an argument about the efficiency of systems
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
I am. But system efficiency hacking requires CONTROL of the system. I have no control over somebody else's property. Without extortion.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @billstclair @swardley
Of course no stealing! I mean the trillions in untaxed capital much of it laundered building empty apartments. The system is inefficient.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Of course it's inefficient. We're individuals. Everybody, except a handful of saints, is watching out for #1. It's also bountiful.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
It's the tax code that causes all that capital to go into empty apartments. Look THERE for the fix.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.