He was running against 1 other person at that point in a state of 20 million so I’d say this is probably more significant!
-
-
-
We don't even know how many of those 3000 are Iowans, so I don't know if it's more significant.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This was a Howard Dean problem in 2004https://www.huffpost.com/entry/candidate-confessional-howard-dean-speech-2004_n_5695280de4b086bc1cd53fd3 …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Wasn’t he also behind in the polls in NY? He’s leading the RCP average in Iowa *and* he’s been attracting large crowds at his events. Crowd size isn’t determinant but it’s most definitely a factor, especially in a state that has a caucus. Enthusiasm is a big factor in Iowa.
-
The polls are a strong indicator. The crowds, who knows? How many are even Iowans? Will anti-Bernie vote see the crowds and get more motivated to turnout and stop him? Most voters don’t go to any campaign events at all.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
New York has a closed primary. Many in the crowd of 28K weren’t registered Dems so couldn’t vote in the primary.
-
NY was hardly the only state where Bernie drew big crowds but still lost.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
i hope bernie doesn't win. but given the differences b/w NY and IA this might not be the best comparison. how are biden's crowds looking? does he have enough 'energy', or whatever you want to call it, on the ground to mobilize ppl on Monday.
-
We all know Biden's crowds are not "energy" crowds like Bernie's. We shall find out soon enough how much that matters.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
