No, unless we’re talking tennis or boxing
-
-
-
Golf?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Bill Russell
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
While I don't evaluate in championships, there *is* kind of a weird tendency of a subset of stat people to not seem to count playoff experience at all. I tend to mentally weight it at 2/3 times regular season. It's enough to get me over the line to Ortiz when I get to vote.
-
That's two-to-three, not two-thirds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In any sport? One basketball player can have a larger impact on a team than one baseball player, so it's hard to compare across sports.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not for team sports.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It depends on the sport. I think it does for sports where the better team has a much higher chance of winning and one player has a greater impact on the team like basketball or quarterbacks in football. Baseball no because the playoffs are such a crapshoot.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a mistake to dismiss "clutchness." Playoff performance isn't just random. I understand sample size must be considered. Peyton Manning was a different quarterback in the postseason; which is to say, he underperformed relative to his regular season performance. That matters.
-
"It's a mistake to dismiss 'clutchness.'" No it isn't, because clutch ability doesn't exist
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.