Bill Slawski  

@bill_slawski

I answer questions (use the hashtag ) , , Director of SEO Research , (SEO - 1996) Carlsbad, Jurisdoctor: him/his/he

San Diego, CA
seobythesea.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2008.
1.123 fotografije ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @bill_slawski

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @bill_slawski

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    5. velj

    I started including a check of whether clients are in Google's knowledge graph as part of site audits for them. It's good to know if Google recognizes them as an entity.

    9 replies 52 proslijeđena tweeta 208 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Tired of seeing all the 'unsubstantiated' predictions and opinions. There's plenty of evidence of the directions of search and marketing in papers and journals and legitimate marketing research papers. Stop being lazy SEOs and spouting your unfounded opinions.

    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 43 minute

    A lot of SEOs lost the ability to think for themselves. Common sense lost, they parrot theories to each other, like a religion. Over time calling them "SEO principles." They never ask: "Why would this specific thing even matter to Search?" Bill isn't one of those SEOs obv 🙃

    Odgovor korisnicima @bill_slawski @YiannisKrinelos i sljedećem broju korisnika: 2
    If your claim that something is a ranking factor because someone from Google said something related, like "this is how Google may calculate domain age." That is not proof of anything. It is not proof that Google uses domain age as a ranking factor.
    2 proslijeđena tweeta 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisnicima

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 58 minuta
    Odgovor korisnicima

    So, no matter who does the testing, you may not be able to rely on their interpretation (even if they did the tests properly!). But - at the very least - No One should take anything as "gold", and should, at the very least, apply some thinking/analysis before believing it.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 minuta

    & Learning about New Product Lines. Patent analysis by Google working hard to improve its product to compete with by offering free / unpaid (non-ads) product results h/t

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. prije 2 sata

    Google Podcasts App and Making Podcasts Easier to Find What podcasts are you listening to? What do you like about them?

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I’d laugh at the ridiculousness but someone will believe this somewhere

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I know...can you believe the rumours that the earth is round?

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. prije 2 sata

    Clickbait articles that spread misinformation may mislead people into focusing upon stuff that really doesn't matter at all. Question what you read and remain skeptical. Question everything. Sunshine is one of the best cures for bad information.

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @bill_slawski
    Tired of seeing all the 'unsubstantiated' predictions and opinions. There's plenty of evidence of the directions of search and marketing in papers and journals and legitimate marketing research papers. Stop being lazy SEOs and spouting your unfounded opinions.
    9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 2 sata

    This needs to be inscribed in the forward of any book that gets written about SEO.

    Odgovor korisnicima @YiannisKrinelos @brettmandoes @dejanseo
    Honestly, if you make a claim that something is a ranking factor, include some supporting evidence behind that claim that is more than just "Matt Cutts once said..." or "Google has a Patent that says.". Stop spreading misinformation. Use real arguments with supporting evidence.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. prije 2 sata

    There's too much nonsense on the web about Google's ranking factors that are prime examples of logical fallacies and faulty arguments. Provide some evidence and reasoned arguments.

    This needs to be inscribed in the forward of any book that gets written about SEO.
    2 proslijeđena tweeta 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 4 sata

    Ready to recalibrate your strategy for 2020? 58 industry pros share their top tips to take into the new year. Hear from: • • • • • • • • & more! Get the free guide:

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. prije 3 sata

    Topics instead of keywords!

    4 proslijeđena tweeta 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 9 sati

    Via Vincent Boucher. I think it is time to optimize our contents with Machine Learning and NLP.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 9 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I am compiling a list of knowledge panel sources that either have no description / no link or that have a link to source other than Wikipedia (ie the entity has no Wikipedia page for Google to refer to) SHould be interesting :)

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 sati

    Thank you for sharing this SIR ❤️👍. It is a Gem 💎.

    I started including a check of whether clients are in Google's knowledge graph as part of site audits for them. It's good to know if Google recognizes them as an entity.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I'd also like to see more correlation between various schema types and data related to performance, knowledge graph, SERP features, etc. Currently, the incremental value of some of the lesser known schemas is difficult to prove and more importantly get developers to prioritize.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 23 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I agree 100%. And some complete examples for complex organizations too

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 24 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Try :)

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 24 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Agreed for sure as it's always an edge case you need to consider... Or new vertical you have to get your head around

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi

@bill_slawski još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·