Using the threat of violence to affect political change only works if the ordinary person is sufficiently afraid. Example A and example B aren't different, they are a functioning unit. Example A gets what he wants because of the action Example B took.
-
-
-
Very good point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Who cares. It's meant to be proactive. Violence should be utilized more often. What are cops is not a inherent threat of violence? Are they not the same, walking around in a vest and guns? They should be afraid.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Holding the legislature at gunpoint is not peaceful. Even if the guns are never fired, the implicit threat is coercion in and of itself.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Charmander pin.
-
And is that....a visitor sticker on his leg?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Easy, the good guy’s wearing a Gucci belt!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

