Manon Berriche

@berriche_manon

PhD Candidate 👩‍💻 Working on 🤔 Graduated from & 👩‍🎓 Also passionate about literature 📚

Paris, France
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @berriche_manon

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @berriche_manon

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    6. pro 2019.

    1/12 🗣️I am excited to share the preprint of my first research article co-written with 🔥 “Sister, I love you!” Phatic Posts Are More Successful On Facebook Than Health Misinformation

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    This time it IS out! Not Born Yesterday, arguing that people aren’t gullible. Psychology! Political science! History! Anthropology! Media studies! ToC below, and threads to follow with stuff I wish I’d put in the book

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    Here's our . Many voices warn that social media may be filtering out news that we dislike. Here's what the research says about it 'The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths' By our own Richard Fletcher

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    The best talks are not necessarily given by the most prestigious speakers, and are not always on the topics that you’re the most interested in. At the talk I enjoyed the most was given by on the need to include pragmatic in automatic text analysis.

    Poništi
  5. 24. sij

    To do so they compared the toxicity from internet users’ comments and those of participants at a comment elicitation task and found that comments where more toxic online and that these toxic comments generated more engagement

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 24. sij

    1/2 Last talk at 🧨 explains a study he conducted with , and Jin Wook Kim on comments toxicity on Facebook. They asked wether the selection of uncivil people into commenting changes the tone and content of political discourse.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Very interesting presentation by showing that despite anecdotal claims of increased hateful and w-nationalist content on Twitter, longitudinal data does not confirm this view - at least when looking at mentions to 2016 candidates

    Poništi
  8. 23. sij

    Really enjoyed my first poster session at . The preprint is available here:

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Had a great poster session at where I presented our paper on fake news: 🙃

    Poništi
  10. 23. sij

    Spot fake news by making it - presenting the « get bad news game » 😈 Putting people in the shoes of fake news producers and showing them which cues can be relevant to detect misleading tactics reduce the perceive reliability of fake news

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    This thread ticks all the boxes: 1) summarizes my presentation nicely, 2) shows two key slides, 3) and includes one of my favorite gifs :)

    Poništi
  12. 23. sij

    To express their support for their political side. To test this hypothesis, the study used 2 photos from Trump and Obama inauguration and asked people which one has more people. In other words, the answer was quite obvious. Yet participants may have intentionally wrongly answered

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 23. sij

    During his talk at , quoted this study from & suggesting that individuals answer to survey may not reflect what they truly believe; instead they may intentionally provide misinformation to researchers. Why?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 23. sij

    2/2 While the mere use of words like «fuck» will be systematically identified as a sign of incivility by AI tools, pragmatic people will interpret such words in light of their context of enunciation to understand finely if the intention behind is to insult or just to tease others

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    1/2 Nice talk from at explaining why automated approaches need to shift from tone to substance to better capture onlive incivility and intolerance.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Quel futur se dessine pour la traduction automatique ? Venez échanger sur ce sujet lors du prochain séminaire du médialab le 28/01 avec du et Info et inscriptions :

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Thrilled to be in 1st issue w/, Lockett, , , : "Fake news" may have limited effects beyond increasing beliefs in false claims We find null effect of article exposure on media trust, affective polarization, etc

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  19. 20. sij

    Merci à pour la relecture. À lire : la chouette expérience qu’il a réalisée avec la chouette et qui suggère d’engager davantage de discussions avec le grand public sur des sujets scientifiques controversés : 👩‍🔬 👨‍🔬

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 20. sij

    Dans le cadre du cours conçu par , les 2A de se sont transformés en explorateurs 🕵️‍♂️🕵️‍♀️ Retour sur l’enquête d’un de mes groupes d’étudiants sur la diversité des méthodes de fact-checking ✅

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. sij

    Now published! I review the large range of reviews already published about how digital technologies + social media affect teenagers and give recommendations for how to improve this area's research in future.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·