.@GregShupak assesses what some mainstream media writers think about US intervention in Syria: "That Syrians might not want to be occupied by the US is never considered in any of these articles, such is the extent of the authors’ imperial hubris."https://fair.org/home/us-isnt-leaving-syria-but-media-lost-it-when-possibility-was-raised/ …
.@MaxBlumenthal: "Despite being subjected to a tidal wave of deceptions and a campaign of pro-war perception management of unprecedented scale, the Western public has managed to maintain an attitude of healthy distrust toward its media establishment."https://www.truthdig.com/articles/syria-controversy-dont-believe-the-official-narrative/ …
-
-
“The FFM will continue to carry out its independent and impartial mission based on interviews with relevant people, its findings from the site visits, analysis of the sample results, as well as any other information and materials collected.”https://twitter.com/opcw/status/989146968474750977?s=21 …
Show this thread -
.
@Jonathan_K_Cook “we are getting yet more revisions to a story that was originally presented as so cut-and-dried that it justified an act of military aggression by the US, UK and France against Syria, without authorisation from the UN Security Council.”https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2018-04-28/the-west-closes-its-ears-to-douma-testimony/ …Show this thread -
.
@stephenkinzer: “Conveniently timed attacks that give pretexts for war, however, are not always what they seem. History suggests that we should await clear evidence before falling into well-laid traps.” https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/04/27/hoisting-false-flag/hRC63gFcq1zMUmd8UObqLM/amp.html …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
BREAKING: