lee rowland

and when this speech is violent in its content, don't be surprised when violence erupts.

'speech=violence' is how cops shut down civ rts protesters..and wld love to shut down BLM. crap logic.

milo's hate speech leads to violence. Destruction of property not violence. Important distinction

that's what cops say about BLM protests (obviously it's wrong).Should we grant govt that power?

I miss the connection you make.

if you claim that speech doesn't include the right to get $, govt can just use power of the purse to censor.

claiming violation of free speech because paid event got cancelled is not the same as not being allowed to protest

nor did i suggest it was. and have no plans to file a lawsuit.but both on censorship spectrum, albeit in very diff places.

so is this where donations are going, to protect milo??

this silence feels like a "yes"

sorry, busy responding to the glut of liberals redefining speech to exclude Milo:u have Q?

again, is this where donations are going, to protect milo from protests?

oh thank goodness, looking forward to your next blog post "only liberals could ever disagree with me"

no, can confirm: EVERYONE hates a free speech attorney.

by this logic it is fine for me to give people your address and tell them to murder you

you are literally going to get people killed. How on earth can you live with yourself knowing that??

speech isn't violence.& helps to have colleagues who work directly w/marginalized communities the 1A lets ppl 2 spew hate at

right, I'm not talking about violence I'm talking about publicly telling people your address and to find you and kill you

from everything i read on it (I wasn't there), I saw no reports of this "kill" language. source?

what if I were to just give folks your address and not say the word kill but merely suggest it

OK, so...no source? seriously, I know he's abhorrent. but ad hoc "harassment' tests would give govt SO MUCH power to censor.

you're equating "here is their photo and where you can find them" to "harassment".