Would you rather: 1) Have your vulnerable systems taken offline w/o warning by whitehat (with note on how to patch) 2) Get crypto-ransom
-
-
Replying to @berendjanwever
I voted for 1 but would be concerned about systems that perform critical functions (medical, utilities)- might not need data
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bensmith83
Would you rather have them hacked by a blackhat than a whitehat? If you don't chose, that choice will be made for you.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @berendjanwever
files being locked up on an eg life support system might not be worst case scenario, but rebooting that system might be.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @b_jammin_ @bensmith83
in that case crims will soon start rebooting it until you pay them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @berendjanwever
valid point, but that's not the current model.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @bensmith83
So you believe we don't have to plan ahead and prevent future threads?
8:34 AM - 29 Nov 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.