Thank you the replies, but I still see no explanation *how* this info about its inside can go outside without going FTL.
-
-
Replying to @berendjanwever
heres a reasonable analogy thats not perfect but gives an idea (1/many)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HumanActuator @berendjanwever
so we can infer the weight creating the black hole, by seeing how stuff (sand) moves near the hole. (6)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HumanActuator @berendjanwever
this is near the hole but not in it, so its observable. (finished :))
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HumanActuator
Thanks, but that does not explain the problem of how the sheet knows how to bend without getting information about the ball.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @berendjanwever @HumanActuator
My original assumption was that the mass of a black hole is inside the black hole; out of reach without FTL travel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @berendjanwever @HumanActuator
like how the mass of the ball bending the sheet is distributed evenly inside the ball. This is not the case.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The "sheet" also does not curve concave back "underneath" a black hole like the sheet does in your analogy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.