It's not portable so the old way of doing it is still required. There is no right way to implement this.
"known bugs without known exploits" is an assumption unless you're omniscient
-
-
i'm saying a bug with an exploit has higher priority than one without. that's it.
-
Fair enough; failing data a risk guestimate will have to be used to prioritize.
-
But prio minor perf gain over sec.risk when "safe" is 1st keyword in project goal? Odd
-
I did not personally make this call.
-
Not accusing anyone, just explaining my point of view on such matters.
-
no worries, i totally hear you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.