Why was the "bug" intentionally introduced into the language to improve performance by 1% then?
-
-
to be clear, I am not making that assumption.
-
"known bugs without known exploits" is an assumption unless you're omniscient
-
i'm saying a bug with an exploit has higher priority than one without. that's it.
-
Fair enough; failing data a risk guestimate will have to be used to prioritize.
-
But prio minor perf gain over sec.risk when "safe" is 1st keyword in project goal? Odd
-
I did not personally make this call.
-
Not accusing anyone, just explaining my point of view on such matters.
-
no worries, i totally hear you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.