...except Tavis was talking about a light bulb, not matches. Goal is illumination, not ashes.
-
-
Replying to @berendjanwever @sschlesier and
Candles illuminate, too. You want a lightbulb analogy? OK, here it goes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @berendjanwever and
Tavis: this WiFi-enabled lightbulb has a security hole.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @berendjanwever and
Me: Microsoft lightbulbs don't light the room well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @sschlesier and
I'm pretty sure Tavis was saying he'd rather be in a dimly lid room than in a house on fire.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @berendjanwever @sschlesier and
He's finding security holes, not hardware failures, so it's not the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @sschlesier and
True, and I'll take hardware failures over security holes every day of the week.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @berendjanwever @sschlesier and
You prefer your hose burning down to strangers entering it without permission?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @sschlesier and
No. but I see now what Tavis meant by AV using different metrics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @berendjanwever @sschlesier and
Yes, as I said in another thread, we disagree on what measures AV quality and risk evaluation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well I think the underlying problem is disagreement on what a logical fallacy is, but sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.