True, but the more power a person/institution has, the more transparency is required and for very practical, consequentialist reasons. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/786226506989178880 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ChaseMadar @ChMadar
What about random climate scientists? Or Sony employees? Or anyone who emailed the DNC or Podesta?
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @chrislhayes
The more power they have, the less privacy they should have and that should include powerful private corporations like Sony.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
difficult argument. what’s the power threshold for personal privacy?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @samboykin @chrislhayes
The line-drawing here requires discernment, but that doesn't mean it's not possible or undesirable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
drawing lines is always the issue. think it’s central.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @samboykin @ChMadar
but the point here is that there's no one drawing the line. We're not having a policy discussion. We've entered a world
1 reply 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @chrislhayes @samboykin
Let's have that policy discussion! I mean, please, put it on your show!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
is there any conceivable policy that would require campaigns to publish all internal emails?
6 replies 4 retweets 8 likes
Not a defensible one in my view.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.