The week after US v. Jones, @RonWyden asked James Clapper whether ruling would affect IC activities. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/09/27/ron-wydens-past-provocative-hearing-question-on-cell-site-location/ …
-
-
@benwizner@emptywheel I'm no expert but it seems to me that Sotomayor's concurrence is the part of Jones that's especially useful -
@onekade@emptywheel Also Justice Alito's opinion for four justices. So we have five who looked beyond "physical intrusion." -
@benwizner@emptywheel yes I agree fine I'll bite my tongue next time (DAMN U SCALIA) -
@onekade Can't you just learn to love Sam Alito when he serves your purposes, silly?@benwizner -
@emptywheel@onekade@benwizner Let's not get too enthusiastic about Sam there, mmkay? He'll break yer heart baby.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@benwizner@emptywheel also, it's no Supreme Court, but http://privacysos.org/node/1075Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@benwizner@emptywheel duh I think long term cell tracking is unconstitutional without a warrant! And while Jones is nice and all...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.