I quibble w last line. Opinions/legality/situations change. See Japanese internmet, Cold War nuke buildup,WW2 censorship @benjaminwittes 2/2
-
-
Replying to @mattapuzzo
@mattapuzzo I agree that opinions change--and rightly so sometimes--but they generally should not change because they become public.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@mattapuzzo It seems to me, Ben, that you do what you accuse others of doing: reach firm conclusions without full facts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benwizner
@benwizner When I speculate, I label it as such, as I have done clearly here. To the extent my speculation is wrong, my conclusions not firm1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes Are you saying that your claim Congress was "pretending" not to know abt dragnet was speculation?@benwizner2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@benjaminwittes You speculate about whether there's "retrenchment." But how are you so sure you "dissent" from it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benwizner
@benwizner I dissent from what I believe is going on: i.e., retrenchment from policies believed to be legal and necessary.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@benjaminwittes The best place to do that would be in court. Instead, they seek to dismiss our challenges on standing and secrecy grounds.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.