Benton Heimsath

@bentonheimsath

Cities, real estate, affordable housing. Follow me here:

Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @bentonheimsath

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @bentonheimsath

  1. 31. sij

    Idgaf as a superpower

    Poništi
  2. 14. sij

    I have no insight into NYCHA, but it's jarring to see this contrasted with the enthusiasm for building new public housing in some parts of Housing Twitter

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 14. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 14. sij

    Idea: the rise of podcasting is really a story about land use and transit dysfunction in the US, leading to long solo drive times

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. sij

    7/ Overall, it seems like the story that new apartment buildings drive up nearby rents is not, on average, true. This worry may have too large of an influence on housing policy, preventing the construction of new housing that can improve both local and regional affordability.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 11. sij

    This guy sounds like a drug peddler, not a university dean: “These are choices. We’re not coercing,” said Avishai Sadan, dean of USC’s Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry. “You know exactly what you’re getting into.”

    Poništi
  7. 4. sij
    Poništi
  8. 2. sij

    New years resolution is to actually be a person instead of just lurking. Let's go!

    Poništi
  9. 28. pro 2019.

    Great hanging out with and tonight!

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. pro 2019.

    A reader might infer from this fig. that land costs are a major driver of housing costs. But land costs are a *consequence* of housing prices. If developers can pay $1116 / sqft and earn normal profits, they will bid up price of sites (land) till total cost = $1116 / sqft. 2/5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 3. pro 2019.

    is bad: "The project must complete all of its environmental documents, which include the train’s exact route, by 2022 — forcing the rail authority to make early decisions about designs that may not be built for years or even decades."

    Poništi
  12. 3. pro 2019.

    Nice article by about how people use "infrastructure" as an excuse to oppose housing. One point he didn't make is that these SAME people will also oppose improving said infrastructure! NIMBY bad faith at its finest.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A number of readers wrote me yesterday to ask how it's possible that in CA it costs an average of $450,000 (and close to a million in SF) to build a single unit of subsidized housing. I wrote a little CA Today item about it:

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    when everyone is a contrarian you have to say you're a contrarian in more contrarian ways

    Poništi
  15. 26. stu 2019.

    If you genuinely believe that landlords keeping units intentionally vacant is raising citywide rents, shouldn't you necessarily also believe that creating new units will help lower citywide rents?

    Poništi
  16. 21. stu 2019.

    If this shit is gonna happen to 100% affordable, supportive housing then what's even the point ...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 21. stu 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 20. stu 2019.

    is a yimby too, 3.2 million new homes needed. now pivoting to gentrification...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 20. stu 2019.

    Holy shit is going full and I'm into it

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 20. stu 2019.

    Steyer gets the housing question!!! And he's talking about the housing shortage! Who won the pool?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·