@monkbent What do you think of this theory? Explains delayed reaction and why Microsoft didn’t do it before apple.
-
-
@monkbent :) maybe we agree because I thought he supported what I said too. Don’t throw out disruption theory just because its expensive. -
@apere006 I've never once said it should be thrown out -
@monkbent I know :). Just with the case of the iPhone, personally I think you are too quick to say that dis. theory doesn’t apply here. -
@apere006 I said it didn't describe what it did to phones. Horace is expanding the definition here. I gave it a new name. Same idea though -
@monkbent He not expanding it. I mentioned market disruption before you wrote your article. Clay didn't see the importance enough. -
@apere006 because disruption has always been about cheaper products that weren't good enough. As Horace noted, iPhone was exact opposite -
@monkbent No it isn’t. http://insideintercom.io/what-everyone-needs-to-know-about-disruption/ … Its just easier to identity so it gets more attention.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.