@monkbent again disrupts erroneous applications of Disruption Theory. http://stratechery.com/2013/obsoletive/ …
-
-
Replying to @gassee1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @eric_perlberg
@eric_perlberg@monkbent Subsuming Christensen, neat.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gassee
@gassee@eric_perlberg subsumative is the word. Darn it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@gassee@eric_perlberg "get me rewrite!"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlesarthur
@charlesarthur@gassee@eric_perlberg I thought about it, but subsumate only works sometimes. Obsoletive it is1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@gassee ahh, just to be clear we were discussing your theory subsuming Christensen, not the use of obsoletive as used in the essay1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @eric_perlberg
@eric_perlberg @gassee I know :)
5:54 AM - 30 Sep 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.