Wrote with some trepidation: http://stratechery.com/2013/clayton-christensen-got-wrong/ …
@claychristensen is a hero of mine, but IMHO low-end disruption theory is flawed
@naofumi I gave several. I even titled the section "counter examples"
-
-
@monkbent Yes, I read those but found the discussion very brief. Also 2/3 were in the "luxury" market. I would like more Tech examples. -
@naofumi that's the point. According to low-end disruption, there shouldn't be a luxury side Consoles, music players, phones... -
@monkbent Thanks. I understand your reasoning. Not aware if Clay ever applied his theory to luxuries or fashions though. -
@naofumi my point is there is no reason to say a technological product is somehow different
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.