The theory of low-end disruption is flawed: it doesn't apply to consumer markets (including Apple)
http://stratechery.com/2013/clayton-christensen-got-wrong/ … /tip @Techmeme
-
-
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent Your analysis fails to distinguish between evolution of an industry and competitive analysis of a specific company in this context3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mvakulenko
@mvakulenko whereas I interpret new market disruption to argue there is only 1 sustainable position long term1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent IMO market position is defined by customer benefits, not product characteristics. Multiple positions possible with diff biz models2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.