@monkbent @claychristensen did concede his theory did not work for the case of Apple & refine his theory in a recent HBR article months back
-
-
Replying to @bernardleong
@bleongcw@claychristensen do you have the link handy? Worried it appeared at a busy time and I may have missed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent Still searching. I remember that it's either in the June or July issue where they review disruptive technology@claychristensen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bernardleong
@bleongcw@claychristensen no surprise - spent those two months moving internationally. Thanks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent Ok, I got it wrong, but@gruber referenced an article on him conceding the iPhone prediction to be wrong: http://daringfireball.net/2012/07/iphone_disruption_five_years_in …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bernardleong
@bleongcw@gruber yeah - he said it was actually disruptive to the PC. Which is true. I have a follow-up to this (just didn't have space)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent Fermat said that he did not have space to put it down on paper. anyway, jokes aside.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bleongcw haha - as you know, space on a blog is limited ;)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.