The theory of low-end disruption is flawed: it doesn't apply to consumer markets (including Apple)
http://stratechery.com/2013/clayton-christensen-got-wrong/ … /tip @Techmeme
-
-
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent But Apple is in a B2B market: the market for smartphone subsidies. We all know how the iPhone does without them.@sameer_singh172 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
@fpgeek@sameer_singh17 I've said for a long time the no-growth argument is fair: http://stratechery.com/2013/two-bears/ The collapse argument isn't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@sameer_singh17 Is Apple's app advantage sustainable if their market share drops to the levels we see in unsubsidized markets?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @fpgeek
@fpgeek @sameer_singh17 Wrote about it in the $550 5c post
8:22 PM - 22 Sep 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.