The theory of low-end disruption is flawed: it doesn't apply to consumer markets (including Apple)
http://stratechery.com/2013/clayton-christensen-got-wrong/ … /tip @Techmeme
@fuelcut yeah, that's more complicated. Obv. they're the primary customers, but customer demand drives their actions.http://stratechery.com/2013/why-do-carriers-subsidize-the-iphone/ …
-
-
@monkbent true. but then its just shades of gray vs. PC OEMs? in any event, i agree christensen's theory is by no means universal. -
@monkbent btw, in b2b markets (think linux v win server), integrated players go to great lengths to quantify soft value -
@fuelcut yep. Everything is far grayer than it appears ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.