@monkbent I noticed the same thing a couple weeks back! In retrospect it’s truly stunning.
-
-
Replying to @caseyliss
@caseyliss@monkbent I put that down to the awkward vagueness of the phrase. Who knew what that meant?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willhains
@willhains@caseyliss@monkbent It's unusually bad wording for Steve. Everyone in our office was like 'what's that?'1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ChrisHarris
@_ChrisHarris@willhains@caseyliss how would you have described it in 2007?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@willhains@caseyliss I wish he'd put it second of three. Wording? 'Internet Tablet' was what people were wanting from Apple.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ChrisHarris
@_ChrisHarris@monkbent@caseyliss YES! I agree. The ordering of the three took the punch out of it. “Phone” should have been last!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willhains
@willhains@_ChrisHarris@caseyliss it was in the exact correct order2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@_ChrisHarris@caseyliss Interesting — I expected you to agree with that. Why?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willhains
@willhains@_ChrisHarris@caseyliss text book laddering. 1. What exists 2. What you're expecting 3. What is revolutionary4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent "Revolutionary mobile phone" puts iPhone at number 3 ;) He clearly chose 'Communicator' since it existed as a Nokia brand.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@_ChrisHarris iPhone isn't a phone. And if you think that was a Nokia reference you're nuts :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.