RT @monkbent: @sameer_singh17 @JohnKirk Apple is a very different kind of company. @asymco has his finger on this.
S is for service?
-
-
Replying to @JohnKirk
@JohnKirk@sameer_singh17@asymco no, listen to the critical path1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @sameer_singh17
@sameer_singh17@JohnKirk@asymco there are no incentives to maximize profit/market share in a functional org1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@sameer_singh17@JohnKirk@asymco Yep Apple has transcended silly profit and market share objectives. Like Chairman Mao did also.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jpnKevin_T
@jpnKevin_T@monkbent@JohnKirk@asymco The implication is that exec compensation isn't linked to those metrics.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sameer_singh17
@sameer_singh17@jpnKevin_T@JohnKirk@asymco no, the implication is that no one "owns" the iPhone business1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@jpnKevin_T@JohnKirk@asymco So the iPhone's P&L isn't linked to exec compensation. Isn't that the implication?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sameer_singh17 @jpnKevin_T @JohnKirk @asymco yeah, of course. Also no one can give the order. Two faces of same coin I suppose.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.