@counternotions each developer implementing their own rules wouldn’t be worse than IAP. But an Apple sanctioned option would be preferable
@counternotions @drbarnard no one likes SAP. Totally understandable
-
-
@monkbent@drbarnard I'm pointing out legal/operational aspects of the issue, not tech per se, even given SAP/Teradata, for small returns? -
@counternotions@monkbent So many IAP implementations are user hostile, I don’t see how trials would be any worse legally/operationally -
@drbarnard As long as IAP reqs are spelled in the app description pre-purchase, I don't see the huge problem you do.@monkbent -
@counternotions@monkbent It’s clear that IAP are available in the app, but not at all clear how/when/where/why/etc -
@drbarnard More mandatory disclosure upon pain of ejection?@monkbent -
@counternotions@monkbent Apple doesn’t seem to care much what developers do with IAP. The rules arent particularly strict, except no trials -
@drbarnard@counternotions@monkbent Strongly disagree. I and other devs have had terrible problems with IAP subscriptions. Nasty policies. -
@invalidname@counternotions@monkbent Right, I wasn’t thinking about subscriptions. Those really are locked down tight.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.