@monkbent it makes sense. Microsoft was waiting for OEM to use WP and they didn't as much as they wanted. So they decided to go heavy
-
-
-
@kmaaouni you cannot be more committed than Nokia already was. So committed they were likely going bankrupt and had to be saved -
@monkbent only Nokia was and they had limited resources. Msft needed to step in with all its weight and money. Not limited backup -
-
-
-
-
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@monkbent That Ballmer straitjacket must actually be the Board's, no? They're doubling down on leveraging Gates' vision to “Everywhere!”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent Smart.Also enjoyed your thinking re:Nokia on @vectorcast. Seems that Elop may have been poorer steward of company than Ballmer.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent in the meanwhile msft will be able to justify direct investment in Nokia and get immediate return the market asks for :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent patents will serve as a weapon again android :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent it was time to grow WP faster and Nokia alone could not do it. But Nokia will keep being an ally and will hunt android guysThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.