@monkbent It's always been that IAP is for digital products consumed within an app only. Anything else can (and must) be sold yourself.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent That quote from Apple's counsel – about receiving 30% on physical goods – is just plain wrong. IAP has always been digital-only.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent how do you effectively censure a intransigent firm like apple, with both political and monetary muscle. Its a bargaining position.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent Pretty much.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent how did you go reading the decision?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent Exactly; DOJ should complain about / target their remedies to what Apple actually did, not what they theoretically might have done -
.
@elkmovie 2 issues: - Amazon is dominant, not Apple. This is nonsensical - if App Store isn't monopoly, Apple can exclude what they want -
@monkbent Absolutely on #1. If no exclusion was a well-established / consistently-applied principle I could get behind that, but it's not. -
@monkbent Companies use their power in one market for leverage in another all the time, at least as brutally as Apple, and don't get sued.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.