@arebee no.
That said, they case was far more cogent than this ebooks or airline nonsense
@arebee these lawsuits are similarly misguided and similarly ground in fuzzy thinking
-
-
@monkbent I disagree. The anti-trust statute is to prevent collusion between competitors. It's not fuzzy at all, and is grounded ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent ... in the Common Law principle that you can only have torts for actual harm. It's laid out in page one of the decision.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent You're confusing "publishers don't like the channel setting price" with the fact Apple conspired with publishers to raise prices.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@monkbent What tweaks you about this? That Apple is involved? Cross subsidy or loss leading? I'd point you to the iTunes box set sales. ;-) -
@arebee also, ascribing an argument's position to perceived company loyalty is kind of logical fallacy 101 :) Also, I used to work for MSFT -
@monkbent I read your bio :-) You used to intern at Apple too? It was a question - many people are tweaked that Apple were convicted. -
@arebee fair enough, and yes, that's true. I would have been just as perturbed had Apple/Amazon been in opposite positions
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.