Hrm. @monkbent wins the internet today. @stevesi discusses his post about Microsoft reorg: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LearningByShipping/~3/JDybx_PBzGM/ …
-
-
Replying to @charlesarthur
@charlesarthur I actually don't disagree with@stevesi. Key is his post was about Windows; mine about Microsoft. Makes my point, in a way1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
@monkbent@charlesarthur@stevesi but wasn't "windows" at that point >3 somewhat distinct businesses: win/IE + live + search?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fuelcut
@fuelcut@charlesarthur@stevesi I have a follow up coming, hopefully Monday AM, addressing why functional is good1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benthompson
.
@monkbent@fuelcut@charlesarthur more variables than product to pivot--sched, code, partners, etc.always used a combo of GM and discipline1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stevesi
.
@monkbent@fuelcut@charlesarthur key is operationalize/ know seams so work gets done in right place. the whole focus of onestrategy ;-)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@charlesarthur @stevesi @fuelcut and is "one strategy" preferable for ALL of Microsoft?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.